LoU/ LoC should be restored with proper safeguards: Standing Committee Report

Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Commerce Chaired by Shri Naresh Gujral, presented it report on 06 August 2018 on “Impact of Banking Misappropriation on Trade and Industry

The report extensively covers  RBI Ban on LOU / LOC and its impact on the Industry and committee’s recommendations. In summary,  Committee  has recommends that LoU/ LoC should be restored at the earliest albeit with proper safeguards.”

Relevant extract from the report are given below.

DISCONTINUATION OF LETTERS OF UNDERTAKING / LETTERS OF COMFORT

2.1 The banks assign both fund based and non fund based credit limits for the purpose of trade finance. The traditional and the most commonly used methods of non-fund based trade finance is a Bank Guarantee or a Letter of Credit. The importers have also been availing Buyers Credit against Letters of Undertaking (LoUs) issued by their banker. Inasmuch as fund based trade finance is concerned, credit instruments like working capital loan/Rupee Export Credit Loans have been in vogue. Another way of financing the trade is through assignment of receivables i.e. factoring, which is in infancy in the country.

2.2 The RBI being mindful of the need to simplify the procedures related to trade finance to bolster trade and to liberalise the foreign exchange regime has progressively delegated more powers to Authorised Dealers (banks) for undertaking foreign exchange related transactions. Accordingly, one of the measures adopted on November 1, 2004 in order to promote investment activity and to further liberalise the procedures related to trade credit for imports, was to grant general permission to Authorised dealers to issue Guarantees/Letter of Undertaking (LoU)/ Letter of Comfort (LoC) in favour of overseas suppliers, banks and financial institutions up to an amount of USD 20 million per transaction.

2.3 The RBI has, however, discontinued the practice of issuance of Letters of Undertaking (LoUs)/ Letters of Comfort (LoCs) for Trade Credits for imports vide Para 2 of RBI Circular No 20 dated March 13, 2018. Para 2 reads as under:

On a review of the extant guidelines, it has been decided to discontinue the practice of issuance of Letters of Undertaking (LoUs) and Letters of Comfort (LoCs) for Trade Credits for imports into India by AD Category –I banks with immediate effect. Letters of Credit and Bank Guarantees for Trade Credits for imports into India may continue to be issued subject to compliance with the provisions contained in Department of Banking Regulation Master Circular No. DBR. No. Dir. BC.11/13.03.00/2015-16 dated July 1, 2015 on “Guarantees and Co-acceptances”, as amended from time to time.

2.4 The Committee was informed that the Buyer’s Credit has been disrupted on account of the RBI Circular dated 13 th march, 2018. Buyer’s credit is a short term credit available to an importer (buyer) from overseas lenders such as banks and other such financial institution enabling the importers to make good of the payments in due dates against goods they have imported. Buyer’s credit helps local importers gain access to cheaper foreign funds that may be closer to LIBOR rates as against local sources of funding which are more costly due to higher rates of interest and suffers with  uncertainty in terms of availability. Buyer’s credit has several advantages for the importer. On the one hand the overseas exporter gets payment on due dates, on the other hand, the importer gets extended date for making an import payment as per the cash flows. The importer can negotiate a better discount and use the buyer’s credit route to avail financing.

2.5 As per a study of India Ratings published in Hindu Business Line (Apr 23, 2018), the total outstanding buyer’s credit of the top 160 importers as of 31st March 2017 was over INR 330 billion of which INR 312 billion of credit was availed by large importers and remaining (INR 19 billion) by SME importers. It also stated that unlike large corporate, the level of dependence on buyer’s credit in total debt of SMEs is very high.

2.6 The Committee was informed that there is a decline in export credit to the tune of 24.4% ending fiscal 17-18 and as a percentage of priority sector lending (PSL) it was only 1.74%. The Year-On-Year decline in export credit was 29.6% in 2018. The Committee felt that such a sharp decline in exports credit along with discontinuance of the issuance of LoU/LoC might not augur well for the future and will impact exports adversely. It is a matter of deep concern and deserves immediate attention in order to avert likely disruption to trade and industry.

2.7 In response to the Committee’s concern over the likely disruption to trade and industry on account of discontinuation of issuance of LoUs/LoCs, the Department of Financial Services has stated that discontinuation of issuance of Letters of Undertaking (LoUs)/ Letters of Comfort (LoCs) does not mean discontinuation of trade credit as a means of Trade Finance. Trade Credits, including Buyer’s credit can be availed of as a form of clean credit, apart from availing Bank Guarantee for Trade Credit, subject to extant trade credit guidelines and RBI circulars. It has been further stated that as before, Letters of Credit (LC) and Bank Guarantee continue as forms of Trade Finance. Existing LoUs/LoCs (Letters of Understanding / Letters of Comfort), issued prior to the RBI Circular dated 13.03.2018, discontinuing LoUs/LoCs, may also continue till their original validity, although no roll-over is permitted.

2.8 The Committee held interactions with FIEO, Chambers of Commerce, Export Promotion Councils, Industry Associations, etc. to understand the disruption, if any, caused to the trade and industry in the context of the ban imposed by the RBI on issuance of LoUs/LoCs.

*** For Industry view recommendation, please refer attached report

Committee Views and Recommendations

2.31 In view of the above submissions, it is amply clear that after the discontinuation of issuance of LoUs/LoCs, there has been a decline in trade finance as well as rise in the cost of credit. It is feared that such a development will hobble the performance of our trade and industry. The Committee notes that though the exports figure as of now does not show a downward slide as a result of the ban on LoUs/LoCs yet it is not too far in time when the effect of the ban on LoUs/LoCs will reflect in terms of decline in exports. The  Committee, however, has been informed that there has been a slight dip in diamond trade.

2.32 The Committee finds that the immediate casualty on account of the ban on LoUs/LoCs has been the ability of importers to secure a low interest short term credit in foreign currency. The curb on LoUs severely impacts their liquidity and raises the funding costs. The Department of Commerce has shared an analysis carried out by FIEO which shows that the cost of credit for industry has increased:

2.33 Even the banks during interaction with the Committee have unanimously agreed that the impact of discontinuation of LoU/LoC on the cost of credit is to the extent of 2 to 2 1⁄2 per cent which is substantial in absolute terms and is much costlier than the LC products or the funded limits made available by the Indian banks as a substitute to the LoUs and LoCs.

2.34 Besides the considerable increase in the cost of funds for domestic exporters/importers, the Committee notes with concern that as for the LoUs already issued, a “risk premium” has already been set in for any Indian paper. The Committee was informed that foreign lenders have reduced credit exposures for short term dollar loans to local counterparts. Accordingly, foreign lenders have become reluctant to accept the guarantees from their local counterparts. Banks such as, Citigroup Inc., Deutsche Bank AG, Standard Chartered Plc and HSBC Holdings Plc are declining / reducing exposure to these transactions, used by smaller companies to access short-term dollar funding. It was informed that the premium on Indian paper has shot up by 10-50 bps. LoU-based short-term loans are coming in at a premium of 10-30 basis points, and in some cases it has gone up to even 50 bps. Similarly in case of Supplier’s credit, there is a marginal hike in the interest loaded by the Supplier. But since the LoUs were issued against all types of imports such as Import Bills under Collection, Direct Imports done by the Importer apart from the FLC bills, its prohibition has led to decrease of finance for such imports. It has also put the competitiveness of the local businesses vis-à-vis traders from other countries under strain. Further in the aftermath of the fraud, the overseas financial lenders are keenly monitoring the aspects such as Regulatory Compliances, KYC details and detailed verification of underlying transactions.

2.35 The embargo on issuance of LoUs has caused imports bills getting pending for payments and clearance of import consignments have got stalled. It has been submitted that companies have already started considering cutting down on their raw material sourcing due to increased costs and this will have an impact on their overall turnover.

2.36 Moreover, after the discontinuation of LoU/LoC, the importers will have to convert their rupee loans into foreign currency to make payments to their foreign suppliers. This will cause a spurt on the spot demand of the dollar in currency market. There is all likelihood that the spurt will lead to high conversion cost causing hardship to the importers. On the other hand, the Banks have the ability to raise foreign currency from overseas at a very reasonable rate due to their credit worthiness and capital adequacy. The banks could pass on the benefit of low interest rate raised by them through LoUs/LoCs. Now, the importers are left to fend themselves. The Committee expresses its deep concern on the present situation when the rupee is weak, the rise in spot demand will prove to be onerous on importers. It recommends that RBI may take measures to enter into bilateral currency swap agreements with major trade partners to meet spot demand and buy back exporters’ receivables. This will enable the smooth currency movement in the market and further it will not impact the forex reserves.

2.37 The Committee enquired about the accessibility of other trade finance instruments and it was informed that getting letters of credit (LC) is a time-consuming process as various rules need to be complied by the beneficiary and verified by the bank. A lot of documentation is required which results in consumption of huge resources of the applicant. These instruments involve a commission fee along with a so called acceptance charge which is not the case with LoUs as they only involve a guarantee fee. The Committee recommends that necessary interventions may be made to streamline and simplify the procedure in processing of LCs. The Committee also desires that maximum concessions may be offered on LC charges especially to MSMEs.

2.38 The Committee further notes that no banks except State Bank of India (SBI) have come up with an alternate instrument which could be as cost effective and accessible to the importers as LoUs/LoCs. The Committee welcomes that State Bank of India has developed a new reimbursement product with systemic and compensatory controls which is being extended presently to the AAA and AA rated large corporate customers and will gradually over a period of 6 months be extended to the SME borrowers as well. The Committee recommends that SBI must ensure that SME borrowers are not left out for want of desired credit ratings and hopes that other banks shall also come up products which can provide convenience similar to LoUs/LoCs.

2.39 The Committee enquired about the reasons/basis for the RBI to discontinue issuance of LoU/LoC and the likely impact of such a measure on the trade and industry of the country. The RBI has informed that subsequent to their interaction on 5 th March, 2018 with the Foreign Exchange Dealers Association of India (FEDAI) it was advised to the RBI that there was neither a standard format for LoUs/LoCs nor a standard protocol like the one prescribed by the ICC in respect of LCs/Documentary Credit (viz., Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary Credits). In the interest of the stability of the banking system and to strengthen the existing mechanisms, it was decided to discontinue issuance of LoUs/LoCs for trade credit with effect from March 13, 2018. The RBI has stated that since LCs and Bank Guarantees, which are standardized and internationally used instrument of trade credit, are readily available to the trading community through the banking system and are also subject to well-recognised norms of the ICC, it is expected that the needs of the industry would be catered to adequately.

2.40 The RBI has further stated that due to the sizable fraud recently reported by the Punjab National Bank, related to misuse of LoUs, the Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance requested on March 6, 2018 the RBI to consider the need to continue LoUs, especially since an option like Letter of Credit (LC), governed by a set of rules issued by International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Paris was already available for supporting international trade.

2.41 The Committee is not convinced with the justification proffered by the RBI for discontinuing issuance of LoUs/loCs. The Committee notes that the RBI has stated that it was advised by FEDAI to discontinue LoUs/LoCs as there was neither a standard format for LoUs/LoCs nor a standard protocol like the one prescribed by the ICC in respect of LCs/Documentary Credit (viz., Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary Credits).

2.42 During its interaction with the representatives of both public and private sector banks, many of whom being FEDAI members, the Committee was told that LoUs/ LoCs has been an effective instrument for raising short term credit in foreign currency. All the banks, including FEDAI PSB members, have unanimously accepted that the LoUs/ LoCs were not flawed instruments. Instead, these were means of raising cheaper finance for trade. They informed that LoUs and LoCs which were made available were within the sanctioned LC limits of the various borrowers. These were unique to India though the same is not approved under the UCPDC. The fraud was localized to only one bank, one branch and was committed and perpetuated by one family. It is significant that the other bankers have not suffered any loss under the LOUs and LOCs issued by them. The Committee notes that in line with the RBI instructions most of the banks have reduced their exposures under the LOUs and LOCs by more than 75 per cent.

2.43 The Committee strongly feels that the RBI has perhaps not held enough consultations before deciding to discontinue issuance of LoU/ LoC. The Committee notes that the RBI has in a response to the comments sought by the Department of Financial Services about the impact of discontinuation of LoUs/ LoCs on credit cost for short term foreign currency loan has stated that there is no comparative reporting to RBI of quantum or cost of trade finance through LoUs/ LoCs vis-à-vis other available avenues of raising short-term foreign currency finance. If this be the case, then the Committee is constrained to say that the RBI should have done more scrutiny before proceeding with the decision to ban LoUs/ LoCs. The Committee is of the view that the discontinuation of issuance of LoUs/ LoCs is a knee-jerk reaction by the RBI to the recent frauds. It is a typical case of throwing baby along with the bath water and it must be stopped. The Committee, therefore, recommends that LoU/ LoC should be restored at the earliest albeit with proper safeguards.

Conclusion

5.3 The Committee notes that RBI has responded to the banking misappropriation committed through fraud related to LoU at one branch of the Punjab National Bank by discontinuing the practice of issuance of Letters of Undertaking (LoUs) and Letters of Comfort (LoCs) for Trade Credits for imports into India. The Committee is of the considered opinion that discontinuation of the practice of issuance of LoU/LoC for trade credit by the RBI was a knee-jerk reaction. The Committee feels that the RBI got unnerved with the PNB fraud and it hastened the decision to ban LoU/LoC without much thought and consideration. It is significant to note that none of the stakeholders representing trade and industry including banks with whom the Committee held deliberations have suggested that LOU/LoC was a flawed trade document. Everyone has been unanimous that LoU/LoC was a widely accepted bank instrument globally. Its efficacy as a source of cost-effective short term credit of foreign currency for importers was unmatched. Its preference by the foreign supplier in comparison to LC is also well-recorded. Moreover, RBI has itself promoted it after thorough verification more than a decade ago. The Committee notes that there is also a unanimity that the ban of LoU/LoC has resulted in rise in the cost of credit by 2 to 2 1/2 %. This will certainly affect the cost competitiveness of country’s trade and industry and have a cascading effect on jobs. The loss of jobs is something the country can ill-afford.

5.4 The Committee strongly feels that the RBI should have engaged more in consultations with stakeholders on the matter before resorting to discontinuation of LoU/LoC. It is of the considered opinion that LoU/LoC should be restored at the earliest albeit with proper safeguards. Its restoration assumes more significance in the face of the fact that the content of imports is over 20% of India’s total exports. In present times when the currency is witnessing high depreciation, it is imperative that the cost of credit for imports must be minimal. The ban on LoU/LoC takes away the benefit of cheap source of funds availed by the importers. Costly imports shall lead to higher costs of production and erode the competiveness of the domestically produced goods. The loss of competitiveness takes away the gains that might have accrued to export on account of rupee depreciation.

5.5 The Committee also feels that discontinuation of LoU/LoC as a response to the fraud and misappropriation has set in a contagion of conservatism in banking sector. The banks have become very stringent in their operation and credit exposures. The caution has inadvertently made banks becoming inaccessible to MSME sector. The Committee is concerned that such an approach has the dangers of making banking services elitist and subservient to a few large corporates leaving out the vast majority of MSME units which are not able to measure to the standards and parameters laid down by external credit rating agencies for getting ‘AAA’ or ‘AA’ ratings. The MSME units are getting burdened with high cost of loan which is further accompanied with the demand of unreasonably high collateral by the banks. The Committee is constrained to state that such an approach also crowds out innovative, high risk, growth segments, which is not good for the economy in the long run. It recommends the Government to set things right and take necessary measures in all earnest for the purpose.

Reference

  1. Report: Impact of of Banking Misappropriation on Trade and Industry
  2. RBI Stops Buyers Credit Transactions (LOU & LOC)

Letter of Credit Clauses Related to Suppliers Credit

Supplier’s Credit is a structure of financing Import into India. In this structure, overseas suppliers or financial institutions outside India provide financing to importer on Libor linked rates against Usance letter of credit (LC). Supplier’s credit internationally is also known as Usance Payable at Sight (UPAS) structure.

Continue reading Letter of Credit Clauses Related to Suppliers Credit

Letter of Credit – MT 700 Format

Earlier article “Types of Swift Message used in Letter of Credit and Suppliers Credit” discussed details related to Category 7 message. This article further explore MT700 used for Letter of Credit Issuance. This will help importers understand various fields in MT700, related UCP 600 reference etc.

Continue reading Letter of Credit – MT 700 Format

Major changes in ITR 1 (Sahaj) for AY 2018-19

Income Tax Return Form – 1 (Sahaj) is applicable to only Resident Individuals having Incomes from Salaries or Pension, One House property, Other sources and having total income upto Rs. 50 lakhs.  The new ITR-1 form is not applicable to Non-residents and Residents but not ordinarily resident (RNOR).

Continue reading Major changes in ITR 1 (Sahaj) for AY 2018-19

Revised Nature of Business or Profession Codes for ITR Forms – AY 2018-19

Nature of Business or Profession Code is required to be furnished in ITR 3, ITR 4, ITR 5 and ITR 6. In the new Income tax return (ITR) forms for A.Y 2018-19, below changes are made in Nature of Business or Profession Codes. 

Continue reading Revised Nature of Business or Profession Codes for ITR Forms – AY 2018-19

Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Number

What is Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) ?

The LEI is a 20-digit, alpha-numeric code that identifies legal entities participating in financial transactions. Each LEI is unique and contains reference information that enables simple and quick identification of an entity. As an international standard (based on ISO 17442), all LEI information is openly published and accessible to all.

Continue reading Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Number

How to Resolve IGST Refund Issues for Exporters

IGST refund for Exporters – Provisions

As per Rule 96 of the CGST Rules 2017, the shipping bill filed by an exporter shall be deemed to be an application for refund of integrated tax paid on the goods exported out of India. Being so, opting LUT/NA or mentioning “0” against “IGST Paid” field, will keep away the exporter to avail refund claim even if they have paid the IGST as the exporter himself has declared the same in the Shipping Bill. However, following Circular No. 8/2018-Cus dated 23.03.2018, an option has been made available by the DG Systems in ICES for sanctioning IGST refund in respect of those cases where the exporter has erroneously declared that the shipment is without payment of IGST, although they have declared and paid the IGST in GST Returns.

IGST refund Procedure for Exporters

Once the GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B are filed “CORRECTLY”, then the data dump will match with the GST Network and it will transmit the data to ICES (Indian Customs EDI Systems).

On receipt of the data from the GST Server, an integration between Shipping Bill and data received from the GST takes place.

If no mismatch / error is found while integration, Systems tagged the Shipping Bill as “Ready” for scroll generation. PFMS (Public Financial Management System) is the portal to remit the amount to the exporter’s account against the eligible shipping bills/invoices.

“Not Ready” tag is given to the Shipping Bill in two situations, namely:

A. Either the data pertaining to the Shipping Bill/Invoice, has not been sent by the GST Network to ICES (i.e. Customs Portal).

B. Or the data has been received from the GSTN, but the same has been stuck into some error code(s) while integration.

If systems notice any mismatch between Shipping Bill data and GST data, it generates Response Codes viz. SB001, SB002, SB003, SB004, SB005 and SB006.

GST Network does not transmit the data to ICES

There may be several reasons why GST Network does not transmit the data to ICES:

  1. Either GSTR-1 or GSTR-3B or both has not been filed with GSTN.
  2. Amount of IGST is more in GSTR-1 than the IGST amount shown in the GSTR-3B. So it is important that data pertaining to domestic supplies should also be in symmetry as far as matching of GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 is concerned.
  3. Amount of IGST is to be shown in 3.1(a) instead of 3.1(b) in GSTR-3B.  In GSTR – 3B column 3.1 Details of Outward Supplies and Inward Supplies liable to reverse charge; Amount of Export Turnover is to be filed in 3.1.(b) – Outward taxable supplies (zero rated) instead of it to be entered in 3.1.(a)
  4. Invoices of that particular month are not being filled up properly in Table 6A. (like Port Code, Shipping Bill Number, Shipping Bill Date etc.).

Solution: Data in GSTR -1 can be amended using Table 9A. It is worth mentioning that only single time amendment is allowed in an invoice in Table 9A. So while correcting the GSTR-1, exporters are advised to remain cautious and maintain 100% accuracy.

As far as correction in GSTR-3B is concerned where mistakenly amount of 3.1(b) has been shown against 3.1(a), Exporters can approach designated Customs officers at ICD/Ports for verification of GSTR data. The officer will fill up the information in Annexure A email the same to DG Systems.

Data has been received from the GSTN, but the same has been stuck into some error code(s) while generating IGST refund

If systems notice any mismatch between Shipping Bill data and GST data, it generates Response Codes (IGST Refund Error Codes)  viz. SB001, SB002, SB003, SB004, SB005 and SB006.

Response Code SB001 : It is generated when Shipping Bill Number or Shipping Bill Date at ICES is not matched with what is mentioned in the GSTR-1.

Solution: Same can be corrected by using Table 9A of GSTR-1.

Response Code SB002 : It is generated when Local EGM has not been filed or filed with some errors.

Solution: Same can be corrected with the help of Container/Shipping Line Agent.

Response Code SB003 : It is generated when GSTIN number is not mentioned in the Shipping Bill or mentioned partially.

Solution: Exporter may approach Customs Officers at the Ports/ICDs from where actual export took place and get the error corrected.

Response Code SB004 : Record already received from the GSTN.

For this Error no action is required from the exporter.

Response Code SB005 : It is generated when Invoice Number or Date of Shipping Bill does not match with what is mentioned in the GSTR-1

Solution: a. Same can be corrected by using Table 9A of GSTR-1.

b. Exporter may also approach Customs formation (from where export took place) alongwith Annexure ‘A’ (Concordance Table). Officers at Customs formations have been allotted physical interface to rectify the error. Earlier this facility was available for the Shipping Bills filed upto 31.12.2017, however, it has been decided by the Board to extend the facility to those shipping bills filed till 28.02.2018. However, it should be kept in mind that no further extension would be given in this regard.

Response Code SB006 : It is generated when either EGM at Gateway has not been filed or filed with some errors.

Solution: a. Get the EGM filed

b. If EGM at Gateway is filed with some errors get it corrected with the help of Shipping Line Agent.

You might get Error Code “C” which mean mismatch of Container Number. For this, officers at Gateway port has been given physical interface (PREV_OFF) to correct this error. Apart from this Error Code “M” (Gateway Port Code in Truck Summary is different from Actual Gateway Port) and Error Code “L” (Leo Date>Sail Date) may be corrected at Local Customs Locations.

Reference:

  1. Tracing Shipping Bill

Statement of Financial Transaction (SFT / Form 61A) Preliminary Response

The due date for furnishing Statement of Financial Transaction (SFT) for Financial Year 2017-18 is May 31, 2018.

Communications are being received by the Income Tax Department for furnishing Form 61, Statement of Financial Transactions (Form 61A) / Statement of Reportable Accounts (Form 61B) on the Reporting Portal. Unlike last year the same was to be submitted on e-filing portal at https://incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in

Continue reading Statement of Financial Transaction (SFT / Form 61A) Preliminary Response

Reserve Bank’s decision to ban LoUs will badly Impact SME

Reserve Bank’s decision to ban LoUs is a knee-jerk reaction; can backfire badly, warn traders

Article in firstpost.com printed with permission: 

An industry-wide practice that worked well until the end of business hours on Tuesday, which allowed D Dhanasekaran’s Tiruppur-based textiles firm — Abi Tex Mills — import machinery from Oman and boost production, has now gone haywire with the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) decision to bar banks from issuing guarantees in the form of letters of undertaking (LoUs) and letters of comfort. “My machinery took a year to be imported and has been installed in the factory for a few months now. But now with buyer’s credit cancelled, I am focused on how to make payments instead of my production,” Dhanasekaran said.

Continue reading Reserve Bank’s decision to ban LoUs will badly Impact SME

Reuters: Indian importers face funding crunch with clampdown on credit guarantees

Article in Reuters printed with permission: 

Continue reading Reuters: Indian importers face funding crunch with clampdown on credit guarantees

Bank Audit – Buyers Credit and Nostro Account

A bank branch goes through four kinds of audits and inspection

  • Internal audit (done by bank staff) on regular basis
  • Concurrent audit (done by a third party), on monthly or quarterly basis
  • Statutory audit (done by the statutory auditor) on quarterly basis
  • Inspection by RBI (annual basis).

In relation to buyers credit transaction, below are the few audit point which are covered by above audits.

Continue reading Bank Audit – Buyers Credit and Nostro Account

Buyers Credit Secondary Market

During the PNB Fraud case, one of the Banks made a statement that:

“It is an active participant in the secondary market for buyer’s credit transactions and it has sold “all the referred transactions’’.

This article tries to throw some light on what is buyers credit secondary market, how the structure works and why banks do transaction in secondary market.

Continue reading Buyers Credit Secondary Market

RBI 2016 Circular : Frauds Related to Trade Finance Transactions – Misuse of SWIFT

RBI in its 2016 Circular to banks had mentioned problem in relation to process followed for issue and reconciliation of SWIFT messages related to Trade finance products and corrective actions banks should take to prevent any fraud. Worth a read.

Continue reading RBI 2016 Circular : Frauds Related to Trade Finance Transactions – Misuse of SWIFT

Implication on Buyers Credit because of PNB Fraud

Latest Articles:

  1. RBI Stops Buyers Credit Transactions (LOU & LOC)
  2. Indian Banks adds Additional Control to SWIFT System
  3. Bank Audit – Buyers Credit and Nostro Account

This article gives layman summary of the PNB fraud case and its impact on buyers credit product and various stake holders like Indian Bank Overseas Branches, Local Banks in India and Importers.

Continue reading Implication on Buyers Credit because of PNB Fraud

Interest Payment to Mauritius: 7.5% Withholding Tax

In earlier article “WHT (Withholding Tax) on Interest on Buyers Credit” and “Withholding Tax (WHT) on Suppliers Credit Transaction”, we had discussed that if buyers credit or suppliers credit is arranged from Mauritius based bank / branches, there was no withholding tax on interest payment as per Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA).

India-Mauritius Tax Treaty was amended on 10 May 2016 and got effective from 01 April 2017. In this article, only amendment related to Interest Payment  (Article 11) is covered.

Continue reading Interest Payment to Mauritius: 7.5% Withholding Tax

Post Libor World – Impact on Buyers Credit

In earlier article we have discussed about various aspect of Libor and its Impact on buyers credit transaction.

In brief, Libor attempts to answer a fundamental question: What is the  cost of money? It does this for a range of currencies (dollars, euros,  pounds, etc.) and for a range of maturities.

Continue reading Post Libor World – Impact on Buyers Credit

Stronger Rupee Impact on Buyers Credit

Currency fluctuation is one of the factor effecting  Buyers Credit.

Chart: www.xe.com

From 62 Level starting 2015, USD INR moved to 68 levels and since then has come back to 64 levels in 2017. This article explores impact of stronger rupee on importers who have availed buyers credit.

Continue reading Stronger Rupee Impact on Buyers Credit

Moratorium Period Impact on Buyers Credit

As per RBI Master Direction on External Commercial Borrowing and Trade Credit banks are allowed to sanction buyers credit on import of capital goods for  3 years with Letter of Undertaking.

In order to avail above buyers credit, Importer will have to get term loan sanctioned with buyers credit as sub-limit with his bank. As seen in earlier article “Buyers Credit on Capital Goods“, moratorium period is one of the factor which importer needs to take care at time of sanctioning of term loan. This article explains

Continue reading Moratorium Period Impact on Buyers Credit

Rising Libor Rates and Its Impact on Buyers Credit

Buyers Credit transactions are funded on Libor rates. Thus any change in Libor directly impact overall costing of the transaction.

Libor rates started rising in 2015 and pace of which got picked up since beginning of 2017. Below 3 Month Libor and 6 Month Libor charts shows the trend. There are two charts for two range.

Continue reading Rising Libor Rates and Its Impact on Buyers Credit

Subsidy under CLCSS Cannot be Claimed Where Buyers Credit is Availed

Trigger for this topic is a question that a reader asked:

“MSME manufacturing  unit doing expansion of machinery by purchasing machinery from abroad   get credit linked capital subsidy scheme (CLCSS) from Central Government.

MSME unit avails buyers credit for payment to overseas buyer and sanctioned term loan is not utilised . Can the unit be eligible for subsidy? ”

Below article gives basic details about Credit Linked Capital Subsidy Scheme and revert to above query.

Continue reading Subsidy under CLCSS Cannot be Claimed Where Buyers Credit is Availed

Buyers Credit & Suppliers Credit in Rupee (INR)

RBI issued a circular on 10 Sep 2015, revising the policy on Trade Credit (Buyers Credit & Suppliers Credit). Summary of the same is given below:

As per revised guidelines, RBI has allowed resident importer to raise trade credit in Rupees (INR) within below framework after entering into a loan agreement with the overseas lender:

Continue reading Buyers Credit & Suppliers Credit in Rupee (INR)

Form 15CA & Form 15CB applicable on All Payment

Post below article CBDT has revised rules for form 15CA and Form 15CB effective from April 01, 2016. Refer article: Form 15CA and Form 15CB not Required for Import Payments

In revised notification issued by CDBT on 16th December 2015, effective 01’st April 2016, import payment has been made part of exempted list. Hence forth Form 15CA and Form 15CB will not required for the same during import transactions.

Continue reading Form 15CA & Form 15CB applicable on All Payment

Can Exporter Retain EEFC A/c Balance for Buyers Credit Repayment

Trigger for this topic is a question that a reader asked:

“Can Exporter retain dollar in EEFC A/c for buyers credit repayment ?”

Below article gives basic details about EEFC account and revert to above query.

Continue reading Can Exporter Retain EEFC A/c Balance for Buyers Credit Repayment

Difference Between Letter of Comfort and Letter of Undertaking

Latest Article:

Letter of Undertaking in simple terms is bank guarantee issued by Indian bank against which overseas bank provide finance on Libor rates. Libor linked finance used by importers are Buyers Credit, Suppliers Credit, ECB etc. Libor linked finance used by exporters is PCFC (Packing Credit in foreign currency)

In earlier articles, terms Letter of Undertaking (LOU) and Letter of Comfort are used regularly. Below article gives difference between both these terms from perspective of buyers credit.

Continue reading Difference Between Letter of Comfort and Letter of Undertaking

Is Service Tax Applicable on Buyers Credit ?

The trigger for this topic is a question that a reader asked:

“I would like to know whether service tax is applicable under Section 66A of the erstwhile Act on availing Buyer’s credit? It is not only the interest which is paid but a number of other fees like the management fees, arrangement fees, hedging cost etc which is paid to banks by the importer”

Continue reading Is Service Tax Applicable on Buyers Credit ?

Credit Rating and Buyers Credit

What is Credit Rating ?

A credit rating represents the rating agency’s opinion on the likelihood of a rated debt obligation being repaid in full and on time. Usually alphanumeric symbols are used to convey a credit rating. Credit rating can be Internal Rating (Banks rate customers internally) or External Rating by external agencies like CRISIL, ICRA and others.

Continue reading Credit Rating and Buyers Credit

Relevance of Operating Cycle in Buyers Credit Transaction

Incase of raw material imports, RBI had delegated approving powers to Authorised Dealers (Banks) for Trade Credit (Buyers Credit / Suppliers Credit) for a tenure upto 1 year from the date of shipment. Bank’s based on internal policies decided customerwise tenure. Because of variation in policies between banks,  few importers used buyers credit for arbitrage.

Continue reading Relevance of Operating Cycle in Buyers Credit Transaction

Revised Guidelines for Merchanting / Intermediary Trade

Further to article published below, RBI received suggestion from merchanting traders and trade bodies, based on which guidelines on merchanting trade transactions have been further reviewed on 28th March 2014 and with effect from 17th January 2014. Summary of the changes are given below.

Continue reading Revised Guidelines for Merchanting / Intermediary Trade

Permitted Methods of Import Payment

The trigger for this topic is a question that a reader asked:

Since Foreign Trade Policy allows imports in INR (Indian Rupees) also, what are the regulations related to buyer’s credit in respect of an import invoice which is in INR ?

Above question is more of an academic question as INR denominated import transaction are very limited but it will help in throwing light on concept of permitted methods of import payment.

Continue reading Permitted Methods of Import Payment

Buyers Credit Tenure Extended to 5 years for Import of Capital Goods

Trade Credit for Import into India

In earlier article “Trade Credit Extended Upto 5 Years for Infrastructure Firms” we had seen that RBI had allowed buyers credit to infrastructure firms till 5 years subject to conditions.

Continue reading Buyers Credit Tenure Extended to 5 years for Import of Capital Goods

Meaning, Process, Procedure, RBI Regulation & More

%d bloggers like this: